TOO LATE

TOO LATE handstamps were used for letters put in at a post office after half- an hour before the scheduled departure of a mail and were then detained until the next mail and the 'TOO LATE' handstamp applied to indicate this. They have been seen for the following post offices. To see the handstamp, click on the link

Brisbane
Bundaberg - Seen by Campbell but not by me
Downfall Creek - Seen by Campbell but not by me
Maryborough - Seen by Campbell in the article below but not by me
Rainworth - Seen by Campbell in the article below but not by me
Rockhampton - Seen by Campbell but not by me
Toolburra - Seen by Campbell but not by me

Too Late in Queensland article by H M Campbell in Philately from Australia, June 1986, pp. 33-6





"TOO LATE" IN QUEENSLAND

By H. M. CAMPBELL, R.D.P. FR.PS.L

I was extremely interested in George Molnar's article "Too Late" Handstamps of New South Wales, in the September 1985 issue of Philately from Australia, as I had been contemplating writing up the 'TOO LATE handstamps of Queensland in my possession (all three of them!)

Mr. Molnar proves conclusively that in New South Wales and Victoria, "TOO LATE' was the equivalent of Late Fee. A further proof that he did not mention is that the special stamp issued by Victoria at the beginning of 1855 to cover Late Fee was actually inscribed 'TOO LATE. 1 am not sure, however, that George is right when he says, after quoting from the Tasmanian Post Office Regulations of 1853, "Here we see that the late fee was officially designated a postmaster's perquisite, ac- companied by the requirement that all Late Fee letters be marked TOO LATE", 1 think he may have misread the last sentence of the quotation, which read: "Letters posted too late for transmission must be marked with the words 'too late' and the date of the Mail for which they may be too late" (my italics).

My reading of this sentence is that it applied, not to letters on which Late Fee had been paid, but to letters which missed the mail altogether. If it had applied to Late Letters, which actually caught the mail, there would be no point in putting on the date of the mail for which the letters were "too late". As the Late Fee was a perquisite of the postmaster in Tasmania, stamps to its value may not have been affix- ed, in which case the franking on the letter would be the same, whether it were an ordinary letter, a Late Letter, or missed the mail altogether. However, it would seem that 'TOO LATE did not equal Late Fee in Tasmania, since there were several TOO LATE handstamps in use, and contemporaneously, several with 'LATE FEE' or 'LATE LETTER", as well as various manuscript versions of both.

All this leads up to the position in Queensland, where, although in most cases it adopted the rates and practices of New South Wales when it became a separate Colony in December 1859, it would appear that TOO LATE' and 'LATE FEE' meant two different things. They certainly did in the Commonwealth period, as Joan Frew illustrates in her book. Queensland Post offices 1842-1980 and Receiving Offices 1869-1927, strikes from handstamps held at three different offices, including both TOO LATE' and 'LATE FEE stamps from all three. The meagre evidence available seems to show that they meant different things from the start.


The earliest relevant cover I have was posted in January 1865 from Rainworth to Rockhampton. It has no adhesive stamp, but was paid in coin, as a manuscript "2d" in the top right corner indicates; there is an unframed single-line 'TOO LATE" handstamp, measuring about 32 x 5 mm. '2d' obviously does not include Late Fee, and the letter, posted at Rainworth on the 24th, did not reach Rockhampton until the 29th, which seems a long time even for those days, so it probably missed a mail. (Fig. 1).

The next item in date order to consider is a cover sent in 1867 from Brisbane to Helensburgh, Scotland, via Marseilles. It is franked 10d, which was the correct rate for that route, but there is an additional 6d. stamp, around which is written 'Late Fee' in manuscript; there is no handstamp. Next I have a cover sent in 1869 from Toowoomba to Dublin, which has a 'TOO LATE. handstamp very similar to the one on the Rainworth cover; if anything, the letters are not quite so tall, the central bar of "E' is the same length as the other two, and there is a stop after 'LATE'; over-inking makes it impossible to tell whether there is a stop after the Rainworth one. The cover is franked 6d., the correct rate via Southampton, and it took from 17 May to 13 August to get from Brisbane to the Holyhead & Kingstown Packet (about three months), which is about a month longer than taken by other covers from the same correspondence. The letter obviously missed the mail steamer at Brisbane, and the 'TOO LATE.' marking must have been applied there. (Fig. 2).

My other 'TOO LATE item comes much later, so I shall mention next a Late Fee cover referred to by Lester Shepard in his article on the Late Fee Markings of Queensland in the September 1976 issue of Philately from Australia. This is franked by two 3d. Chalon Heads and is addressed to Sydney, to which it came as a Loose Ship Letter, and the stamps are cancelled there, either in 1878 or 1876 according to Lester. The cover is endorsed "Late Fee" in manuscript. The Late Fee on inter- Colonial letters at the time was 3d., but from the beginning of 1874 the postage rate was 2d., so if either of the above dates is right, the letter was 1d. over-paid.


I have two inter-Colonial letters of 1873, when the rate by sea was 3d., one from. Gainsford to Sydney, the other from Pimpama to Melbourne, both with 6d. stamps. As the contents are not still in them, it is impossible to tell whether they are double- weight letters, or whether one or other bore 3d. Late Fee. I have neither Too Late nor Late Fee items from the 1880s, or at least items so marked, and Lester Shepard mentions no Late Fee items from this period either.

My last 'TOO LATE' item is an 1892 Id. postcard from Maryborough to Gympie. This may be the first 'TOO LATE' item I acquired, but as the handstamp is struck over the top inscription and the right end is faintly struck, it is only recently that I recognised it for what it was. Only the letters 'TOO L' (8½ mm high), and a straight line about 34 mm long beneath, can be clearly made out. The short rail journey be- tween Maryborough and Gympie should have been accomplished in the one day, but the Gympie backstamp is dated the day after the Maryborough duplex, and there is no additional stamp to pay Late Fee, so it is fairly certain that 'TOO LATE' meant exactly as it says in this case also. (Fig. 3).

It was about this time also that 'LATE FEE' handstamps began to appear. They are not as common as they might be, however, as it seems to have been the general practice to apply the handstamp only when the Late Fee had to be recovered from the recipient, though there are exceptions. Both Lester Shepard and I have quite a few covers, particularly ones posted on T.P.O.'s, with an additional Id. stamp obviously for Late Fee, but with no handstamp. It would seem from all this that in Queensland at any rate 'TOO LATE' and 'LATE FEE' meant different things.

No comments:

Post a Comment